Nicolas Kicker vs Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, Almeida has exhibited exceptional proficiency in their second serve performance, securing victory in an impressive 52.82% of points. On the other hand, Kicker has demonstrated slightly lower proficiency, winning 46.77% of their second serve points. It is worth highlighting the strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions. Characteristic of Almeida's recent form, their return game stats reveal an impressive record of winning 52.07% of their opponent's second serve points. In comparison, Kicker has achieved a commendable success rate of 52.19%. For first serve returns, Almeida has achieved a 35.96% success rate, while Kicker has displayed slightly higher proficiency at 37.93%. These figures significantly influence the prediction of the favored player in their head-to-head matchup. Examining the players' ability to handle pressure, Almeida has showcased remarkable resilience by saving 65.57% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Kicker has saved 55% of breakpoints, which offers valuable insights for in-game betting predictions. Taking a broader perspective on their performance, Almeida has emerged victorious in 55.56% of matches played over the past year, boasting a win-loss record of 15 wins and 12 losses. Meanwhile, Kicker has achieved a win rate of 60%, with 18 wins and 12 losses. These statistics provide an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head clash. Analyzing each player's performance on different surfaces, Almeida has excelled on clay courts, winning 47% of matches (20 wins and 23 losses). In contrast, their performance on hard courts has been less impressive, with a win rate of 0% (0 wins and 1 loss). Kicker, on the other hand, has thrived on clay courts, securing victory in an impressive 60% of matches (332 wins and 221 losses). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has yielded no victories, with a win rate of 0% (0 wins and 1 loss). Considering the level at which each player competes, Almeida has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, winning 60% of matches (15 wins and 10 losses). In contrast, Kicker has primarily competed in the same type of tournaments, achieving an impressive win rate of 78.57% (11 wins and 3 losses). When predicting the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative event level at which each player has been competing. Assessing the quality of opponents faced, Almeida has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 269.81 over the past 12 months. In comparison, Kicker has confronted players with an average rank of 111.87. These opponent quality statistics offer valuable insights into each player's performance. When it comes to deciding sets, Almeida has achieved success in 38% of such sets in the last year. On the other hand, Kicker has proven to be exceptionally formidable, securing victory in 77% of deciding sets played on the professional tour. These figures hold particular significance for live predictions and betting. While past player performance remains a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics when an event is ongoing. Monitoring the section below, which provides an overview of current event stats, can offer valuable insights into players' current form. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players may exhibit enhanced performance levels at specific events, further influencing the outcome. The ability to convert breakpoint opportunities is of utmost importance in recent matches. Almeida has impressively converted 50.85% of these chances, whereas Kicker has demonstrated a slightly higher conversion rate of 54.44%. These statistics can significantly influence in-game live betting tips. For those interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it caters specifically to the interests of avid statisticians and data enthusiasts.